We are using cookies to implement functions like login, shopping cart or language selection for this website. Furthermore we use Google Analytics to create anonymized statistical reports of the usage which creates Cookies too. You will find more information in our privacy policy.
OK, I agree I do not want Google Analytics-Cookies
The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
Login:
username:

password:

Plattform:

Forgotten password?

Registration

J Adhes Dent 18 (2016), No. 2     15. Apr. 2016
J Adhes Dent 18 (2016), No. 2  (15.04.2016)

Page 119-124, doi:10.3290/j.jad.a35905, PubMed:27042703


Effect of Bulk-filling on the Bonding Efficacy in Occlusal Class I Cavities
Van Ende, Annelies / De Munck, Jan / Van Landuyt, Kirsten / Van Meerbeek, Bart
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of bulk filling Class I posterior cavities on bonding to cavity-bottom dentin.
Materials and Methods: Two flowable "base" bulk-fill composites (Filtek Bulk Fill Flowable, SDR), one paste-like "full-body" bulk-fill composite (Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill) and one conventional paste-like composite (Filtek Z100) were bonded (G-ænial Bond) to either a flat surface (3.5 x 3.5 x 4 mm; C-factor: 0.18) or a Class I cavity (3.5 x 3.5 x 4 mm; C-factor: 5.8). After 1-week water storage, the restorations were sectioned to obtain 4 rectangular microspecimens that were subjected to microtensile bond strength (μTBS) testing.
Results: No significant differences in μTBS were recorded between all composites when bonded onto a flat surface (p > 0.05). When bonded into a Class I cavity, the μTBS of all composites except SDR significantly decreased (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Both the configuration factor and the type of bulk-fill composite were found to have a great impact on bonding to cavity-bottom dentin.

Keywords: adhesion, μTBS, shrinkage, configuration