We are using cookies to implement functions like login, shopping cart or language selection for this website. Furthermore we use Google Analytics to create anonymized statistical reports of the usage which creates Cookies too. You will find more information in our privacy policy.
OK, I agree I do not want Google Analytics-Cookies
The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
Login:
username:

password:

Plattform:

Forgotten password?

Registration

J Adhes Dent 16 (2014), No. 5     21. Nov. 2014
J Adhes Dent 16 (2014), No. 5  (21.11.2014)

Page 473-480, doi:10.3290/j.jad.a32812, PubMed:25264551


Evaluation of Microshear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Resin Cement to Monolithic Zirconium Oxide as a Function of Surface Conditioning Method
Bavbek, Nehir Canigur / Roulet, Jean-François / Özcan, Mutlu
Purpose: To evaluate the microshear bond strength (μSBS) of orthodontic resin cement to monolithic zirconium oxide ceramic (MZ) after different surface conditioning methods.
Materials and Methods: Two types of MZ (BruxZir Solid Zirconia, n = 60; Prettau-Zirkon, n = 60) with two types of surface finish (glazed, n = 30 per group; polished, n = 30 per group) were tested after two surface conditioning methods: 1. air abrasion with 30-μm silica coated aluminum oxide (Al2O3) particles (CoJet), or 2. air abrasion with 50-μm Al2O3 particles. The non-conditioned group acted as the control. A universal primer (Monobond-Plus) and an orthodontic primer (Transbond-XT Primer) were applied to all specimen surfaces. Orthodontic resin composite (Transbond-XT) was bonded using a mold and photopolymerized. The bonded specimens were subjected to μSBS testing (0.5 mm/min). Data were analyzed statistically using three-way ANOVA and the Sidac adjustment post-hoc test (α = 0.05). Failure modes were analyzed using a stereomicroscope (30X).
Results: Mean μSBS values (MPa) did not show a significant difference between the two brands of MZ (p > 0.05). In both glazed (44 ± 6.4) and polished (45.9 ± 4.8) groups, CoJet application showed the highest μSBS values (p < 0.001). The control group (34.4 ± 6) presented significantly better results compared to that of Al2O3 (30 ± 3.8) (p < 0.05) on glazed surfaces, but it was the opposite in the polished groups (control: 20.3 ± 4.7; Al2O3: 33.8 ± 4.7; p < 0.001). Adhesive failure was the dominant type in all groups. Conditioning MZs with Al2O3 and CoJet increased the percentage of mixed failure type.
Conclusion: Air abrasion with CoJet followed by the application of universal primer improved the μSBS of orthodontic resin to both the polished and glazed monolithic zirconium oxide materials tested.

Keywords: air abrasion, monolithic zirconium oxide, zirconia, microshear bond strength, orthodontic bonding, surface conditioning method